Even though we are in uncharted territory everyone at Summers, Rufolo & Rodgers, P.C. wants you to know we are here for you. read more
Summers, Rufolo & Rodgers
Call For A Free Consultation
View Our Practice Areas

Affirmative DUI defenses that might apply in your case

There are numerous possible defenses to a DUI charge, including a lack of probable cause for the initial stop, inaccuracies or challenges to the Breathalyzer test results or the blood test results, inadequate training of officers, improper interpretation of field sobriety tests and more. These can be very effective defenses depending on the facts of your case, and our skilled attorneys have years of experience successfully having charges reduced or dropped using these defenses.

There are also less-common affirmative defenses that can still result in the reduction or dismissal of charges.

  • Necessity occurs when a person has driven under the influence to prevent a "greater evil." Examples of this would be to transport a severely injured or ill person to the hospital (when no other means of transportation is available), or to flee from imminent danger. Usually to prove necessity, there must be an emergency situation - not caused by the driver - that will result in impending, serious injury or harm, and there are no viable alternatives to the intoxicated person driving.
  • Duress happens when someone commits DUI under threat of injury or death. An example of duress is forcing an intoxicated person to drive by holding him or her (or another person) at gunpoint. In that situation, nearly anyone would decide that driving under the influence is a better option than potentially being shot.
  • Involuntary intoxication occurs when the driver has ingested alcohol or another intoxicating substance without his or her knowledge. If someone spikes the punchbowl at a party or slips something into the person's soda as a prank, this defense could apply.
  • Entrapment happens if a law enforcement official actively encourages the driver to get behind the wheel while intoxicated. The driver has the burden of proving that he or she would not otherwise have driven drunk but for the actions of the officer.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
Email Us For A Response

Free Consultation

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Summers, Rufolo & Rodgers
735 Broad Street, Suite 800
Chattanooga, TN 37402-2913

Toll Free: 888-778-6575
Phone: 423-933-2738
Fax: 423-266-5211
Chattanooga Law Office Map

Review Us
735 Broad Street, Suite 800